Comprehensive Sampling Program at Tecumseh Property

Joshua Gold Resources conducts exploration program at its historical Tecumseh property, with 34 rock and soil samples currently undergoing lab analysis. Results expected to help shape future exploration and potential development strategies at the company’s long-held property.


Woodstock, Ontario–(Newsfile Corp. – August 6, 2024) – Joshua Gold Resources Inc (OTC Pink: JSHG) is pleased to announce that its geologic team has returned from a re-introductory sampling program at its Tecumseh Property in Davis Township in northern Ontario, north-east of Sudbury. 34 samples consisting of rock and soil were collected over 3 days during the July 2024 program and sent for laboratory analysis. JSHG is eagerly awaiting these results and will share the findings when they become available. Along with the compilation of historic exploration records, the pending sample results will help guide the company’s exploration strategy at the Tecumseh property. The analysis of the most recent samples could pave the way for exciting new opportunities for JSHG and will help to provide a foundation for future trenching and drilling programs at the site.

The roughly 217-acre, four-cell Tecumseh site is a long-held property within the JSHG portfolio. It is located approximately 26 miles east-northeast of Sudbury, Ontario (or about 51 miles by easily accessible road). The site has attracted the interest of numerous operators since the 1920s, while its mineral potential remains overwhelmingly unrealized (in part due to the limitations of the exploration methods used at the time). Following its most recent sampling program, JSHG is enthusiastic about the opportunity to leverage the cutting-edge analytical techniques available and use modern exploration methods to unlock the full potential of this historically promising site.

Historic Highlights:

  • Compilation of all previously reported surface quartz vein grab samples at the property from 2011 to 2020 averaged 14.1 g/t Au (uncut, n = 52, g/t = grams per tonne) or 0.41 oz/t Au, with 54% of samples returning greater than 1 g/t Au (0.03 oz/t), and 23% of samples greater than 10 g/t Au (0.23 oz/t), with a maximum value of 209 g/t Au (6.10 oz/t).
  • Eight large composite grab samples (roughly 9  to 10 pounds each) collected from the trenches by local prospector R. Cyr in 1996 averaged 39.7 g/t Au (1.16 oz/t).

More About the JSHG Tecumseh Property:

The Tecumseh property is primarily underlain by Precambrian rocks consisting of Huronian sediments. These were intruded by Nipissing gabbro sills and dikes. The Grenville Front lies just south of the property, however, the numerous documented gold occurrences in the district (including the historical Au-Cu-Co Scadding Mine) may be genetically related to the older Yavapai Orogeny.

Structurally, the site sits between two prominent northwest-trending faults: the Washagami Lake Fault and the McLaren Lake Fault. Both of these are secondary splays from the main east-west trending Ess Lake Fault. The property features an array of auriferous quartz-carbonate-hematite-mica-sulphide veins occurring over an area of approximately 800  feet by 2,300  feet. These strike northwest-southeast (120-140 degrees), and are hosted in a shallowly dipping gabbro sill.

Exploratory History:

Gold was first reported on the property during the 1920s to 1930s, during which time several shafts or pits were emplaced, however no historical records exist. The property appears to have been left idle until 1959 when Black Crow Mines undertook a self-potential geophysical survey and completed 4 shallow drill holes.

Work resumed intermittently from 1975 to 1988 by various operators. It consisted of geological and geophysical surveys, extensive surface trenching and sampling, and thirty shallow, small-diameter diamond drill holes (BQ at maximum = 1 7/16” core diameter). During this time the currently known system of auriferous veins were delineated, principally by trenching, along seven main trends (termed then from “A” to “G”), with individual veins attaining widths of a couple of inches to as much as 8 feet  (approximately). Notably, some vein trends host as many as eight parallel sub-veins. The veins host accessory sulphide from trace amounts to locally semi-massive vugs of pyrite, pyrrhotite, and chalcopyrite. Historical operators judged the veins to be overly “nuggety” for gold, which hampered surficial trench sampling. This may also help explain why many of the narrow-diameter historical drill holes did not encounter high-grade gold at shallow depths.

Map 1: Location of quartz vein grab samples collected on the property since 2011 (as listed in Table 1 and Table 2) by operator.

Historic Grab Sample Analysis:

In preparation for the current exploration program, an initial compilation of historical data was undertaken. From assessment files and internal reports, “modern-era” surface grab samples (keeping in mind the inherent potential sampling bias of grab samples) were compiled from work by R. Cyr in 1996, Trueclaim Exploration in 2011, Vision Prospecting in 2019, and JSHG in 2020 (Map 1).

The eight samples taken by Cyr (Table 1) were all over-sized (roughly 9  to 10  pounds each) to mitigate the nugget issue. These ranged from 11.6 g/t Au to 69.5 g/t Au (0.34 oz/t to 2.03 oz/t), averaging 39.7 g/t Au (1.16 oz/t). The fifty-two “normal-sized” (approximately 1 to 3 pounds) quartz vein grab samples collected from 2011 to 2020 returned an uncut average of 14.1 g/t Au (0.41 oz/t), ranging from 0.002 g/t Au to 209 g/t Au (0.00006 oz/t to 6.1 oz/t), with 77% of the samples greater than 0.1 g/t Au (0.003 oz/t), 54% of the samples greater than 1 g/t Au (0.03 oz/t), and 23% greater than 10 g/t Au (0.29 oz/t).

For clarity, it should be noted that the forty-one Trueclaim samples and the six Vision samples were prepared using standard crushing and pulverizing, while the five JSHG samples were processed by the laboratory using the “screen metallic” method before assaying, also to mitigate the nugget effect. Where analyzed, these combined samples also returned up to 12 g/t silver (0.35 oz/t), 1.53% copper, and 0.038% cobalt.

Future rock and core sampling work will continue to be evaluated using the screen metallic method, which was not routinely used in the past (other than by JSHG in 2020). Another focus will be on evaluating how auriferous the altered gabbro intervals between the quartz veins are, as historical work largely focused on sampling the veins. Where altered gabbros have been sampled in the past, assays of 0.1 to 0.4 g/t Au (0.003 oz/t to 0.01 oz/t) have been reported. If vein density and grade prove sufficient, consideration of a bulk open-pit mining scenario may be warranted.

Matt Rees, formerly Chief Geologist at IAMGOLD Corp. is leading the geological team and comments, “The high-grade gold values observed to date are very encouraging, and certainly indicate a fertile mineralizing system. It remains to be discovered if the system is better focused on the eastern gabbro-sediment contact, which may be structural but is covered beneath an extensive beaver pond for most of its more than half-mile strike length across the property. We may also find that the system is better developed directly beneath the known vein array, hosted in the sediments that are footwall to the gabbro sill.”

Ben Fuschino, President and CEO of JSHG further comments: “I believe we have the right team and the right property with our Tecumseh site. Given the numerous high-grade gold veins on the property, we are very keen to see how the exploration program unfolds.”

Table 1 – Analytical results from over-sized (roughly 9  to 10  pounds each) surface grab samples collected by R. Cyr in 1996:

Sample_IDEastingNorthingAu_ppmAg_ppmCo_%Cu_%Comment
E654536233517001637.71511.30.0080.81mostly from E6 trench
E1A536252516990769.4645.80.0380.13southern E1 trench
E1536221516993839.08680.010.72northern E1 trench
E536262516988518.244.40.0120.43southern E trench
F536283516983056.164.60.0130.31south-east F trench
O536158516991460.4125.20.0110.19Ore Dump
Mnana25.37240.0060.18composite from various trenches
M1536234516984711.4522.70.0080.19northern F trench

Table 2 – Analytical results for surface grab samples collected by various operators from 2011-2020 (VG = visible gold reported in the sample; TC = Trueclaim Exploration, VE = Vision Exploration, JSHG = Joshua Gold Resources; SM = Screen Metallics; ppm = g/t):

Sample NoEastingNorthingAu ppmAg ppmCo ppmCu ppmSamplerComment
Z06173853622551700900.035119596TC
Z06173953618851700601.0250.553162TC
Z06174053623551700220.0070.52270TC
Z06174153623551700220.0020.53091TC
Z06174253623351700130.273124396TC
Z06174353624051700070.0510.5341318TC
Z06174453623851700100.3613221414TC
Z061745536227517000437.14110339873TCVG
Z06174653622551699770.0170.563191TC
Z06174753621651699772.7080.520291TC
Z06174853621651699770.9750.511146TC
Z06174953620851699520.9790.528197TC
Z06175053621651699772.0410.534783TC
Z06175153621651699770.0550.5281TCVG
Z061752536208516995222.4711214732TC
Z061753536235516990316.3184403098TC
Z06175453626451698900.0090.5477TCVG
Z06175553627851698800.7060.534924TC
Z061756536223516990815.421324TC
Z06175753621851699180.2510.545515TC
Z06175853621651699122.310.519113TC
Z061759536185516991282.5185152818TCVG
Z06176053619551699120.273211117TC
Z06176153619551699129.887148248TC
Z061762536195516991217.107227178TC
Z06176353619551699122.9140.51690TC
Z06176453617551698390.0460.5210TC
Z06176553618151698210.0120.529TC
Z06176653625051698161.0730.5595TC
Z06176753622251697970.0230.51717TC
Z06176953629951697440.0020.51220TC
Z06177053626851697947.6190.51043TC
Z061773536208516991659.0632611697TC
Z06177453631151697870.194129892TC
Z06177553631251697740.3640.542106TC
Z061776536327516980146.35126154TC
Z06177753632351698244.2992653128TC
Z061778536300516982811.132928415255TCVG
Z061780536272516984411.114362465TC
Z06178153603051695640.07231332085TC
Z06178253600751696020.98241022965TC
Q20300153622851700810.359nananaVE
Q20300353618751700631.3nananaVE
Q20300453624251700011.78nananaVE
Q2030055362335169935209nananaVE
Q20300653621651699493.48nananaVE
Q20300753623751698685.73nananaVE
378444536232516993414010.320.36120JSHGSM
37844553621751699390.350.1513466JSHGSM
37844653621351699118.274.5664380JSHGSM
37844753622051699502.220.359799JSHGSM
37844853626251698944.491.6781450JSHGSM

Matt Rees, M.Sc., P.Geo (ON) is a professional geologist and a “Qualified Person” and is responsible for the technical information contained in this news release.

Joshua Gold Resources Inc. (OTC: JSHG) is a publicly traded American gold exploration company headquartered in Canada, engaged in the exploration of highly prospective properties. Joshua Gold’s focus is to pinpoint mineral opportunities in Northern Ontario, Canada, a mature and friendly jurisdiction for exploration and mining companies. Northern Ontario is home to the two- to three-billion-year-old Canadian Shield which contains a wealth of minerals from nickel, gold, and copper, to cobalt, chromium, and lithium. For more on JSHG, please go to https://www.joshuagoldresources.com/.

Investor Relations Contact:

Peter Nicosia, President of Bull In Advantage, LLC
Phone: (585) 703-6565
Email: investors@joshuagoldresources.com

Marketing & Communications Consultant:

Michael Micacchi
Meet Michael Digital Marketing & E-Commerce
Phone: (519) 608-1146
Email: michael@meetmichael.ca
Website: https://www.meetmichael.ca

Safe Harbor Statement This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by, which such performance or results will be achieved. 

Resources:

Location of quartz vein grab samples collected on the property since 2011
Table One (PDF Format)
Table Two (PDF Format)